Home / Articles / Capturing CO2: conventional versus ionic-liquid based technologies

Capturing CO2: conventional versus ionic-liquid based technologies

Elena I Privalova 1
Elena I Privalova
, 
Päivi Mäki-Arvela 1
Päivi Mäki-Arvela
, 
Dmitry Yur'evich Murzin 1
Dmitry Yur'evich Murzin
, 
Jyri-Pekka Mikkhola 1, 2
Jyri-Pekka Mikkhola
1 Åbo Akademi University
2 Umeå University
Published 30 November 2011
Communication , Volume 81, Issue 5, 435-457
50
Share
Cite this
GOST
 | 
Cite this
GOST
Privalova E. I. et al. Capturing CO2: conventional versus ionic-liquid based technologies // Russian Chemical Reviews. 2012. Vol. 81. No. 5. pp. 435-457.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Privalova E. I., Mäki-Arvela P., Murzin D. Y., Mikkhola J. Capturing CO2: conventional versus ionic-liquid based technologies // Russian Chemical Reviews. 2012. Vol. 81. No. 5. pp. 435-457.
RIS
 | 
Cite this
RIS
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1070/RC2012v081n05ABEH004288
UR - https://rcr.colab.ws/publications/10.1070/RC2012v081n05ABEH004288
TI - Capturing CO2: conventional versus ionic-liquid based technologies
T2 - Russian Chemical Reviews
AU - Privalova, Elena I
AU - Mäki-Arvela, Päivi
AU - Murzin, Dmitry Yur'evich
AU - Mikkhola, Jyri-Pekka
PY - 2012
DA - 2011/11/30
PB - ANO Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
SP - 435-457
IS - 5
VL - 81
ER -
BibTex
 | 
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
@article{2012_Privalova,
author = {Elena I Privalova and Päivi Mäki-Arvela and Dmitry Yur'evich Murzin and Jyri-Pekka Mikkhola},
title = {Capturing CO2: conventional versus ionic-liquid based technologies},
journal = {Russian Chemical Reviews},
year = {2012},
volume = {81},
publisher = {ANO Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii},
month = {Nov},
url = {https://rcr.colab.ws/publications/10.1070/RC2012v081n05ABEH004288},
number = {5},
pages = {435--457},
doi = {10.1070/RC2012v081n05ABEH004288}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA
Privalova, Elena I., et al. “Capturing CO2: conventional versus ionic-liquid based technologies.” Russian Chemical Reviews, vol. 81, no. 5, Nov. 2012, pp. 435-457. https://rcr.colab.ws/publications/10.1070/RC2012v081n05ABEH004288.
Views / Visits / Downloads
18 / 18 / 6

Abstract

Since CO2 facilitates pipeline corrosion and contributes to a decrease of the calorific value of gaseous fuels, its removal has become an issue of significant economic importance. The present review discusses various types of traditional CO2 capture technologies in terms of their efficiency, complexity in system design, costs and environmental impact. The focus is hereby not only on conventional approaches but also on emerging "green" solvents such as ionic liquids. The suitability of different ionic liquids as gas separation solvents is discussed in the present review and a description on their synthesis and properties in terms of CO2 capture is provided. The bibliography includes 136 references.