Home / Publications / Applications of microwave technology in the field of solid oxide fuel cell: a review

Applications of microwave technology in the field of solid oxide fuel cell: a review

Share
Cite this
GOST
Cite
GOST copy
Min Fu et al. Applications of microwave technology in the field of solid oxide fuel cell: a review // Russian Chemical Reviews. 2023. Vol. 92. No. 9. RCR5092
GOST all authors (up to 50) copy
Min Fu, Xin Lin, Xiangyang Li, Zetian Tao Applications of microwave technology in the field of solid oxide fuel cell: a review // Russian Chemical Reviews. 2023. Vol. 92. No. 9. RCR5092
 | 
RIS
Cite
RIS copy
TY - GENERIC
DO - 10.59761/RCR5092
UR - https://rcr.colab.ws/publications/10.59761/RCR5092
TI - Applications of microwave technology in the field of solid oxide fuel cell: a review
T2 - Russian Chemical Reviews
PB - Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
AU - Fu, Min
AU - Lin, Xin
AU - Li, Xiangyang
AU - Tao, Zetian
PY - 2023
SP - RCR5092
IS - 9
VL - 92
ER -
 | 
BibTeX
Cite
BibTeX copy
@misc{2023_Fu,
author = {Min Fu and Xin Lin and Xiangyang Li and Zetian Tao},
title = {Applications of microwave technology in the field of solid oxide fuel cell: a review},
month = {sep},
year = {2023}
}
 | 
MLA
Cite
MLA copy
Fu, Min, et al. “Applications of microwave technology in the field of solid oxide fuel cell: a review.” Russian Chemical Reviews, vol. 92, no. 9, Sep. 2023, p. RCR5092. https://rcr.colab.ws/publications/10.59761/RCR5092.
Publication views
15

Keywords

Anodes
Cathodes
Electrolytes
Microwave sintering
SOFC

Abstract

Microwave heating has gained considerable attention as a promising technology for the processing of ceramics, including materials used in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs). This unique heating method utilizes the dielectric loss of materials in an electromagnetic field, offering advantages such as rapid heating rates and low energy consumption. This review focuses on the recent applications and developments of microwave technology specifically for cathodes, anodes, and electrolyte materials in SOFCs. A deeper understanding of the potential benefits and challenges associated with microwave sintering can be gained by investigating the effects of microwave treatment on these SOFC materials. The ultimate goal of the review is to provide valuable insights into microstructure control and performance enhancement in SOFC materials through the use of microwave technology. By highlighting the advances and discussing the underlying mechanisms, researchers and practitioners in the field can explore the potential of microwave processing as a viable option for optimizing SOFC materials and improving overall cell performance.

The bibliography includes 106 references.

1. Introduction

Energy is a fundamental resource that exists in various forms, such as heat, electricity, light, mechanical energy, and chemical energy, among others. Over the past hundred years, fossil energy sources such as coal, oil, and gas have contributed significantly to the rapid development of the industrial economy [1]. However, the formation of fossil energy is a geological process that takes millions of years and cannot keep pace with the relentless and ever-increasing energy demands of modern humanity. What’s more, most fossil energy is used through the combustion process, which generates a lot of harmful substances (such as dust, CO2, NOx, and SO2) and causes serious environmental pollution. Therefore, energy shortages and environmental pollution [2] require a global shift to low-carbon and clean energy in the world [3, 4].

Fuel cells are electrochemical devices that convert chemical energy directly into electrical energy. These devices are not constrained by the Carnot cycle, which is one of the limitations of traditional chemical energy conversion methods [5]. In recent years, fuel cells have gained attention among many energy conversion technologies due to their remarkable efficiency (mainly related to cell size); versatility in application (used in both stationary power plants and portable power devices); as well as their sustained power output and low pollutant emissions [6, 7]. Among the many types of fuel cells, the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is environmentally friendly due to its solid electrolyte, which avoids corrosive environments and facilitates assembly [8, 9].

The current trend in SOFC application is to operate at medium (800 °C) to low (500 °C) temperatures, which places higher demands on the material preparation process. In high temperature (≥ 900 °C) operation, SOFCs exhibit advantageous characteristics such as reduced polarization losses, and are not dependent on the use of precious metals as electrode catalysts. However, there are problems such as grain coarsening and reduced electrode porosity, resulting in reduced electrode
activity [10, 11]. In addition, the inter-diffusion or reaction between the electrolyte and the electrode creates a highly resistive phase that leads to a reduction in the ionic conductivity of the electrolyte [12]. Therefore, achieving lower operating temperatures is one of the key issues to reduce production costs and promote the commercialization of SOFCs.

Microwave heating technology, with its rapid heating and high efficiency, is considered by researchers to be a new environmentally friendly technology [13-16]. Since the 1940s onwards, it has been discovered that electromagnetic waves with frequencies ranging from radio frequency to the microwave band can also heat materials, especially in many areas where microwave heating has characteristics that are incomparable to traditional heating methods. Microwave heating, unlike more traditional heating methods, does not rely on heat transfer but rather on the conversion of electromagnetic energy into thermal energy. The interaction mechanism between the material and the electromagnetic wave plays a crucial role in the process of microwave heating, as it directly influences the efficiency of converting electromagnetic energy into thermal energy [17-19]. It has the following additional advantages over the conventional heating techniques, including:

Homogeneous rapid heating that heats an object by microwave absorption.

Selective heating occurs as a result of the special dielectric properties of various components of the cell materials.

The use of cleaner energy sources and the implementation of cleaner heating processes with the reduction of secondary waste.

Figure 1.
Schematic of published topics related to microwave heating effects on SOFC properties.

Recently, microwave heating technology has been widely used for the preparation and optimization of functional ceramic materials due to its unique ability to homogenous sintering, providing a uniform microstructure, and excellent mechanical performance. The synthesis of Na3Zr2Si2PO12 (NZSP) solid electrolytes by rapid low-temperature microwave sintering has been reported [20]. Microwave-assisted solid phase reaction method was then confirmed to increase the ionic conductivity of NZSP electrolytes [21]. In addition, rapid microwave sintering has been used to process functional electro-ceramic materials. The possibility of tailoring their microstructure and functional properties by selecting rapid microwave sintering regimes has also been discussed [22]. Furthermore, the microwave sintering technique has recently been demonstrated in a significant number of experiments to be able to selectively control the microstructure of ceramic materials, thus realizing the manipulation of performance [23-26]. Intensive research has been devoted to exploring the application of microwave heating to improve the properties of SOFC materials [27]. Recently, Yu published a review focusing on the densification of electrolyte precursors in SOFCs by microwave heating technology [28]. As shown in Figure 1., various components of SOFC systems, including anodes, cathodes, and electrolyte-based materials, have been investigated under microwave conditions. These studies have focused on understanding the effects of microwave treatment on microstructure, conductivity, activation energy, and electrochemical properties. In particular, the conductivity, activation energy, and electrochemical performance of the materials are all affected by their microstructure. Figure 2. gives an overview of the influence of the microwave-assisted processes on the grain size of the materials. Microwave-assisted techniques have been observed to increase the grain size and density of electrolyte materials. Conversely, for anode and cathode materials, microwave-assisted methods often result in nanoscale grain sizes. Despite the considerable researches that have been conducted on microwave treatment of fuel cell materials, a comprehensive summary of key findings is still lacking. Therefore, in order to present the progress made in this field, it is essential to provide a systematic review of the work to date and to enable the readers to gain insight into future research directions.

Figure 2.
An overview of the influence of the microwave-assisted processes on the grain size of the materials.

This research aims to showcase the possible applications of microwave technology in the fuel cell industry by analyzing the microwave sintering mechanism and outlining the modifications in the key components of the fuel cell system, such the electrolyte, cathode, and anode.

2. Microwave heating mechanism

The mechanism of microwave heating reflects the conversion of electromagnetic energy into thermal energy that occurs at the atomic level in a material placed in the electromagnetic field of a microwave device. The dielectric properties of a material determine its ability to absorb electromagnetic field energy [29]

The study of microwave thermal processes requires a thorough understanding of the correlation between material properties and the value of microwave electromagnetic energy. The efficiency of absorption of microwave energy is determined by the properties of the material, which can change as the energy is absorbed, so the properties of the material change in a controlled manner depending on the time the material is in the electromagnetic field [30-32]. The advanced ceramic materials, especially new materials for solid oxide fuel cells, are generally composite or multi-phase materials, which are consequently hybrid absorbers. Currently, microwave technology is utilized for the processing of ceramic matrix composites (CMC), which primarily comprise a reinforcement phase and a matrix phase. The microwave processing of CMC is influenced by several of critical factors, including the microwave frequency, the dielectric characteristics of the base and reinforcing materials, the critical temperature at which the ceramic can be susceptible to the microwave energy, and the particle size of the material [33]. Ceramic molecules interact weakly with electromagnetic waves due to their relatively low dielectric properties. Consequently, many ceramic materials possess a high degree of transparency to microwave radiation under normal environmental conditions. However, above certain critical temperatures (for example, above 600 °C for alumina), the material’s dielectric properties rapidly increase, resulting in effective heating. During the processing of CMC, reinforcing materials with high dielectric loss factors (e.g. SiC, zirconium oxide) can be added to the matrix with low dielectric loss factors (e.g. Al2O3, SiO2, Fe3O4) [34, 35]. Reinforcing materials with a high dielectric loss factor work as a high energy source in a ceramic matrix with a low loss factor due to the absorption of microwave energy.

Figure 3.
Schematic representation of the mechanism for microwave heating of ceramic matrix composites. The shades of rose balls indicate varying degrees of temperature. (Reprinted with permission from [36] Copyright 2016 Springer Link.)

A schematic representation of the microwave mechanism is shown in Figure 3.a,b. The CMC is initially heated by a hot spot in the reinforcement powder by conventional heat transfer until the temperature of CMC reaches a critical temperature. After the critical temperature, microwave energy can be coupled with both matrix and reinforcement powder, resulting higher densities through uniform heating mechanism. As the powder size of CMC and reinforcement decreases, the mechanical properties can be improved through microwave heating, as shown in
Figure 3.c.

3. Preparation of SOFC materials by microwave heating

The electrolyte, which separates the gases used for the fuel and air electrodes to prevent efficiency loss or cell failure due to gas leakage, is a critical component of a solid oxide fuel cell. It acts as a conductor of oxygen/proton ions to create a circuit between the fuel and air electrodes. As a result, the electrolyte material must meet the following criteria: (1) high oxygen ion conductivity and electron nonconductivity; (2) high densities to isolate the reactive gases in the porous layer on both sides; (3) excellent redox stability; (4) good thermal cycling stability and mechanical strength; and (5) good chemical compatibility with electrode materials and sealing materials, and have a thermal expansion coefficient that matches to the coefficients of these materials to prevent delamination.

The unique advantages of microwave sintering technology for producing dense electrolyte layers have been demonstrated in several publications. The initial scholarly investigation of the microwave heating of dense ceramics was carried out on the composition La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.83Mg0.17O2.815 (LSGM) [37]. The study revealed that the synthesis and sintering of LSGM using microwave heating could be achieved in a surprisingly short time of 10 min. In this process, sodium ‘β’ alumina was used as the receiver of microwave energy, resulting in the formation of LSGM with 94% density. It should be noted that the samples obtained by microwave heating had a smaller grain sizes and lower conductivity than those sintered by the conventionally method. According to Figure 4., the average grain size of the microwave sintered sample was 4 mm, while for the conventionally sintered sample that was approximately 10 μm. Rambabu et al [38] then investigated the effect of conventional and microwave-assisted sintering on recycled LSGM samples obtained by the ‘regenerative’ sol-gel (RSG). The RSG method is a combination of the solid state reaction and the Pechini-type method. According to the research results, microwave heating has been shown to be a technology that offers advantages in terms of both time and cost efficiency for the preparation of LSGM electrolyte materials. Zhai et al [39]. reported another refined method to obtain a smaller grain size (2–3 mm) of LSGM by microwave. So far, microwave heating technology has shown advantages in the producing even smaller grain sizes. Subsequently, microwave heating technology was used to produce homogeneous nanoparticles of ceria powders with a grain size 28% smaller than that of conventional commercial ceria, as shown in Figure 4. [40].

Figure 4.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of LSGM La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.83Mg0.17O2.815 samples obtained by: (a) conventionally sintered at 1793 K in air for 12 h; (b) microwave sintered for 10 min. (Reprinted with permission from [40]. Copyright 2003 Springer Link.)

Figure 5.
SEM images of the ceria pellets obtained by heating: (a) at 1400 °C for 12 h in a resistance furnace; (b) and (d) at 1550 °C for 12 h in a resistance furnace; (c) at 1200 °C for 1h in microwave oven. (Reprinted with permission from [37] Copyright 2006 Springer Link.)

The unique advantages of microwave sintering technology in improving the electrochemical properties of electrolytes have also been demonstrated in several studies. In order to suppress electronic conductivity, microwave heating has been used as a superior energy saving source while successfully producing electron trapping nanoparticals [41]. Wang et al [42] reported microwave heating behaviors of four different compositions of yttriastabilized zirconia (YSZ) electrolyte materials. It can be concluded that the microwave field is well coupled to the YSZ electrolyte, allowing for faster and more homogeneous crystallization. In order to reduce the ohmic resistance of SOFCs, Jiao et al [43] developed an effective and simple method (slurry spraying followed by microwave heating) to reduce the electrolyte film of YSZ to less than 10 microns, thus extending the microwave heating technology from the preparation of the electrolyte film to the treatment of the whole cell.

Figure 6.
Electrochemical impedance spectra of electrolyte samples subjected to microwave heating under different conditions: (a) SS-CS samples sintered at 1300–1500 °С–6 h studied at 200 °С; (b) SS-CS samples sintered at 1400 °С–6 h studied at 300–600 °С; (c) SS-CS, SS-MW, SV-CS, and SV-MW comparison samples sintered at 1400 °С for comparisons. SS is solid state, CS is conventional sintering, MW is microwave, and SV is combustion with citric acid pre-treatment. (Reprinted with permission from [44] Copyright 2010 Elsevier.)

Among the factors affecting the performance of SOFCs, the microstructure of the electrolyte plays a crucial role and often depends on the powder preparation methods. The effect of microwave rapid sintering on the grain boundary resistance and grain resistance of the electrolyte (multiple-element doped ceria-based electrolyte) has been investigated [44] As shown in Figure 6.a), the grain boundary resistance decreases with increasing grain size, while the grain size increases with increasing sintering temperature increases. It has been noted that grain boundary resistance can be decreased at lower temperature of the process (as shown in Figure 6.b). In addition, the grain boundary resistance of microwave heated samples is relatively small at 300 °C (as in Figure 6.c), which may be due to segregation of amorphous and dopant phases, or local defects caused by space charge effects. Rapid microwave co-sintering of anode-electrolyte was investigated by Jiao et al. [45], who showed that microwave heating can be used for rapidly producing dense YSZ electrolyte films and to improve cell performance improved by 16%. Subsequently, Acharya [46] found that the grain size growth rate for the microwave sintered electrolyte was linearly related to the rapid densification of the electrolyte film. Smaller grain size was produced by microwave sintering at lower temperatures, resulting in faster oxygen ion conductivity at the grain boundaries. SDC (Ce0.8Sm0.2O19) electrolytes with smaller grain sizes were determined by rapid microwave sintering, and their ionic conductivity and activation energy were refined as electrochemical impedance spectroscopy shown[47]. Gadolinium doped ceria electrolyte (GDC, Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95) was synthesized by microwave coupled heating, demonstrating the great influence of microwaves on the morphology of GDC and consequently on the electrical conductivity of the electrolytes [48]. Recent researches on electrolyte membrane materials for SOFCs have focused on high ionic and negligible electronic conductivity at intermediate temperatures. However, the sinterability of these materials is poor[49-52]. Microwave hybrid heating can overcome the difficulty of electrolyte densification. Silicon carbide exhibits susceptibility to electromagnetic wave coupling and is sensitive to rapid heating due to dielectric loss effects. As a result, the electrolyte can be efficiently heated by conventional heat transfer from the silicon substrate. Santos et al. [53] reported that the successful fabrication of La9.33Si2Ge4O26 materials by silicon carbide-assisted microwave hybrid heating at a lower temperature. The microwave-heated polycrystalline powder Ce0.8Sm0.18Ca0.02O1.9 has promising properties as a potential material for mediate temperature SOFCs. This is due to its suitable properties, including low grain boundary resistance and enhanced ionic conductivity [54]. Figure 7. shows the dependence of the grain size of electrolyte materials on the duration of microwave heating, which can be used to control the oxygen-ion conductivity of the material.

Figure 7.
a) Grain size distribution of Ce0.8Sm0.18Ca0.02O1.9 as a function of microwave heating time. SEM micrographs for the samples obtained by heating under different conditions; (b) conventional heating, 8 h, 1450 °C; (c) conventional heating, 4 h, 1450 °C; (d) microwave heating, 1 h, 1450 °C; (e) microwave heating, 30 min, 1450 °C; (f) microwave heating, 5 min, 1450 °C. (Reprinted with permission from [54] Copyright 2015 Elsevier.)

It is well known that microwave heating differs from conventional heating in that it relies on the dielectric loss of the material to convert electromagnetic energy into thermal energy. This means that the dielectric properties of the material determine its microwave sintering performance. Various researchers have used materials with high dielectric properties to assist in microwave sintering of materials with low dielectric properties. Solid oxide fuel cells researchers are no exception. To improve the microwave sintering performance of gadolinium doped ceria electrolytes, Hari et al. [55] investigated a novel method to prepare nanopowder of Li-GDC with lithium nitrate salt added as a microwave sintering aid. The Li doping, not only acted as a microwave sintering aid to reduce the sintering temperature of the GDC to 600 °C, but also resulted in a 6-fold increase in grain size. Abdullah et al. [56] reported that the conductivity value of GDC or Sm-doped CeO2 (SDC) sintered under millimeter-wave irradiation heating was higher than under conventional heating. The design of their invention conductivity tester is shown in Fig. 8. Figure 8. Jais et al. [57] investigated the properties of zirconia co-doped with 10 mol.% Sc and 1 mol.% Ce (scandia–ceria–stabilized–zirconia, 10Sc1CeSZ) electrolyte synthesized by the microwave-assisted glycine nitrate method. The conductivity is the highest reported for this class of electrolyte, indicating the potential of microwave-induced powders for the development of electrolyte materials.

Figure 8.
(a) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for impedance measurements under microwave irradiation heating; (b) and (c) frequency dependences comparative diagrams for the measured complex conductivities and their fitted spectra by universal dielectric response (UDR) for 15GDC at 600 °C under conventional (Conv) and millimetre-wave (MMW). (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56] Copyright 2017 Elsevier.)

Nevertheless, doped cerium-based electrolyte materials usually suffer from unsatisfactory open circuit voltage (OCV) [58-61]. Ce4+ in ceria can be easily reduced to Ce3+ in reduced atmosphere at elevated temperatures. The reduction behavior has the potential to cause both mechanical degradation of the electrolyte as a result of crystal lattice expansion and the induction of n-type electrical conduction inside the electrolyte. The conduction behavior of the n-type material leads to a partial internal short circuit, which subsequently causes a significant reduction in the OCV of a fuel cell. Kumar et al. [62] prepared the samarium doped barium cerate based Ce0.8Sm0.2O2–d –BaCe0.8Sm0.2O3–d (SDC–BCS) based composite electrolyte by wet chemistry method and microwave sintering. High ionic conductivity is achieved for composite electrolytes microwave sintered at 1400 °C for 20 min. The increase in conductivity is due to the diffusion of oxygen ions migrating mainly through the continuous channels of the second phase (samarium doped barium cerate). The co-dopant composition Ce0.85La0.075Sm0.075O2–d was synthesized by hydrothermal method and sintered in cylindrical pellets form by rapid microwave sintering [63]. Madhusudan et al. [64]investigated the Dy and Pr co-doped ceria Ce0.8Pr0.2–xDyxO2–d as electrolyte material by microwave-assisted sol-gel method, obtaining highest total ionic conductivity of 6.8×10–3 S cm–1 and minimum activation energy of 0.80 eV at 500 °C for the case where x equals 0.1. Furthermore, tri- or multi-doped ceria was investigated because single-doped ceria has disadvantages such as reduced cerium content, low oxygen partial pressures, and electronic conductivity. Raman spectroscopy results revealed that the samples Ce0.8Sm0.1Y0.1O2–d and Ce0.76Pr0.08Sm0.08Gd0.08O2–d exhibit an increased concentration of oxygen vacancies, which in turn leads to improved ionic conductivity [65, 66].

Utilizing microwave sintering technology to prepare SOFCs not only increases the electrolyte’s density but also modifies the cathode-electrolyte interface, thus decreasing the polarization resistance and ohmic resistance [67]. The microwave co-sintering method was also used to produce bi layer of BCZY (BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.2O3–d) and NiO-BCZY at 1200 °C [68]. According to the study by Xu, microwave sintering could improve the protonic conducting performance of BZCY. As shown in Figure 9.a,b, the X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique was used to compare the phase purity of the BCZY electrolyte that obtained by microwave sintering and conventional sintering. The results revealed the existence of a pure BZCY phase obtained by microwave sintering, without any detectable impurities. Whereas the BZCY material obtained via conventional sintering showed the existence of Y2O3 heterogeneous phase. It was reported that the elevated temperature leads to the vaporization of barium oxide, resulting in the occurrence of A-site defects within the lattice structure [69]. Consequently, this phenomenon was shown to be a trigger for the production of Y2O3. The microscopic size of Y2O3 heterophase limits the proton conduction (see in Figure 9.c). This explains why the microwave sintered BZCY electrolyte has a higher proton conductivity.

Figure 9.
(a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern for the BCZY membrane prepared by the conventional sintering method; (b) comparative XRD patterns of BCZY powder prepared by different methods; schemes of proton transport through the BCZY membrane prepared by (c) conventional sintering method and (d) microwave sintering method. (Reprinted with permission from [68] Copyright 2018 Elsevier.)

In summary, microwave technology offers unique advantages in the preparation of electrolyte materials, resulting in optimized electrochemical properties. Table 1 highlights the key areas of microwave heating application, which include microwave-assisted electrolyte powder synthesis and the preparation of layers of dense electrolytes. Numerous studies shown that the lattice size of microwave-assisted synthesized electrolyte powders, such as oxygen ion conductors and proton conductors, tends to be at the nanoscale level. This nanoscale morphology of the electrolyte powders was found to affect their electrochemical properties. By taking advantage the benefits of microwave technology; researchers can achieve finer control over the microstructure and performance of electrolyte materials in solid oxide fuel cells.

Table 1. A brief summary of microwave assisted preparation of electrolyte membrane materials.
\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Membrane electrolyte } & \text { Fabrication process } & \text { Grain size } & \text { Microwave } \text { processing } & \text { Electrochemical properties } & \text { Ref. } \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{0.8} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.2} \mathrm{Ga}_{0.83} \mathrm{Mg}_{0.17} \mathrm{O}_{2.815} & \text { MW assisted solution polymerization } & 2-3 \mu \mathrm{m} & 1400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 9 \mathrm{~h} & - & 37 \\ \hline \mathrm{Gd}_{0.2} \mathrm{Ce}_{0.8} \mathrm{O}_{1.9}-0.34 \mathrm{Mn}-0.34 \mathrm{Co}-\mathrm{Al}_2 \mathrm{O}_3 & \text { MW assisted sol-gel method } & - & 1350^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 30 \mathrm{~min} & - & 41 \\ \hline\left(\mathrm{La}_{0.75} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.2} \mathrm{Ba}_{0.05}\right)_{0.175} \mathrm{Ce}_{0.825} \mathrm{O}_{1.891} & \text { MW assisted combustion } & 2 \mu \mathrm{m} & 1400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 15 \mathrm{~min} & \sigma_{600{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=10^{-2} \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 44 \\ \hline \mathrm{Ce}_{0.8} \mathrm{Gd}_{0.2} \mathrm{O}_{1.95} & \text { MW assisted combustion } & 0.5-2 \mu \mathrm{m} & 170^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 2 \mathrm{~h} & & 70 \\ \hline \text { YSZ } & \text { MW assisted anode-electrolyte }\text { co-sintering process } & 2-3 \mu \mathrm{m} & 1600^{\circ} \mathrm{C} & 0.4 \mathrm{~W} \mathrm{~cm}^{-2}\left(800^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right) & 45 \\ \hline \mathrm{Ce}_{1-x} \mathrm{Dy}_x \mathrm{O}_{2-x / 2} (x=0.05-0.25 \text { at. } \%) & \text { MW assisted synthesis and sintering } & 400 \mathrm{~nm} & 1050^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 1 \mathrm{~h} & \sigma_{550^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=7.42 \times 10^{-2} \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 46 \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{9.33} \mathrm{Si}_2 \mathrm{Ge}_4 \mathrm{O}_{26} & \text { MW assisted solid phase synthesis } & \text { - } & 1350^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 1 \mathrm{~h} & \text { - } & 71 \\ \hline \mathrm{Sm}_{0.2} \mathrm{Ce}_{0.8} \mathrm{O}_{1.9} & \text { MW assisted sol-gel method } & 100 \mathrm{~nm} & 1400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 2 \mathrm{~h} & \sigma_{600{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=10^{-4} \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 47 \\ \hline \mathrm{Ce}_{0.9} \mathrm{Gd}_{0.1} \mathrm{O}_{1.95} & \text { MW assisted polyol method } & 3.6 \mathrm{~nm} & 170^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 2 \mathrm{~h} & \text { - } & 48 \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{9.33} \mathrm{Si}_2 \mathrm{Ge}_4 \mathrm{O}_{26} & \text { MW assisted mechanical alloying } & 1.1 \mu \mathrm{m} & 1350{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 1 \mathrm{~h} & - & 53 \\ \hline \mathrm{Ce}_{0.8} \mathrm{Sm}_{0.18} \mathrm{Ca}_{0.02} \mathrm{O}_{1.9} & \text { MW assisted hydrothermal method } & 2 \mu \mathrm{m} & 1450^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 5 \mathrm{~min} & \text { - } & 54 \\ \hline \mathrm{LiCe}_{0.9} \mathrm{Gd}_{0.1} \mathrm{O}_{2-\delta} & \text { MW sintering with lithium nitrate aid } & 150 \mathrm{~nm} & 600^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 1 \mathrm{~h} & \sigma_{600}{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}=10^{-2} \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 55 \\ \hline \mathrm{Sm}_{0.2} \mathrm{Ce}_{0.8} \mathrm{O}_{2-\delta} & \text { MW assisted combustion method } & 300-800 \mathrm{~nm} & 1200^{\circ} \mathrm{C} & 0.86 \mathrm{~W} \mathrm{~cm}^{-2}\left(650^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right) & 72 \\ \hline 10 \mathrm{Sc} 1 \mathrm{CeSZ} & \text { MW assisted glycine nitrate process } & 19.2 \mathrm{~nm} & 900 \mathrm{~W} & \sigma_{800{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=1.84 \times 10^{-1} \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 57 \\ \hline \mathrm{Ce}_{0.85} \mathrm{La}_{0.075} \mathrm{Sm}_{0.075} \mathrm{O}_{2-\delta} & \text { MW assisted hydrothermal method } & 50 \mathrm{~nm} & 1200^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 30 \mathrm{~min} & \sigma_{600{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=2.10 \times 10^{-2} \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 63 \\ \hline \mathrm{Ce}_{0.8} \mathrm{Pr}_{0.2-\mathrm{x}} \mathrm{Dy}_{\mathrm{x}} \mathrm{O}_{2-\delta} & \text { MW assisted sol-gel method } & 225 \mathrm{~nm} & 1300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 30 \mathrm{~min} & \sigma_{500{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=6.8 \times 10^{-3} \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 64 \\ \hline \mathrm{Ce}_{0.76} \mathrm{Pr}_{0.08} \mathrm{Sm}_{0.08} \mathrm{Gd}_{0.08} \mathrm{O}_2 & \text { MW assisted sol-gel method } & 229 \mathrm{~nm} & 1300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 30 \mathrm{~min} & \sigma_{600{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=3.47 \times 10^{-2} \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 66 \\ \hline \mathrm{Ce}_{0.8} \mathrm{Sm}_{0.2-\mathrm{x}} \mathrm{Y}_{\mathrm{x}} \mathrm{O}_{2-\delta} & \text { MW assisted sol-gel method } & 293-465 \mathrm{~nm} & 1200^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 1 \mathrm{~h} & \sigma_{600{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=2.50 \times 10^{-2} \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 65 \\ \hline \mathrm{BaZr}_{0.1} \mathrm{Ce}_{0.66} \mathrm{Ni}_{0.04} \mathrm{Y}_{0.2} \mathrm{O}_{3-\delta} & \text { MW assisted anode-electrolyte } \text { co-sintering process } & - & 1100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 2 \mathrm{~h} & 0.49 \mathrm{~W} \mathrm{~cm}^{-2}\left(700^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right) & 67 \\ \hline \mathrm{BaCe}_{0.7} \mathrm{Zr}_{0.1} \mathrm{Y}_{0.2} \mathrm{O}_{3-\delta} & \text { MW assisted anode-electrolyte } \text { co-sintering process } & 600 \mathrm{~nm} & 1200^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 2 \mathrm{~h} & \sigma_{700{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=1.4 \times 10^{-2} \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 68 \\ \hline \mathrm{BaZr}_{0.1} \mathrm{Ce}_{0.7} \mathrm{Y}_{0.2} \mathrm{O}_{3-\delta} & \text { MW assisted anode-electrolyte } \text { co-sintering process } & - & 1200^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 2 \mathrm{~h} & - & 73 \\ \hline \end{array} \]
Note. \( \sigma \) is non-stoichiometric oxides, s is electrical conductivity. Refs: [37], [41], [70], [45], [46], [71], [47], [48], [53], [54], [55], [72], [57], [63], [64], [66], [65], [67], [68], [73]
(1)

The anode is a critical component of the SOFCs because it facilitates the catalytic oxidation reaction of the fuel. For efficient fuel oxidation, the anode material must have high catalytic activity and a large specific surface area. Currently, there are two main types of SOFC anode materials: metal-based anodes and chalcogenide-based anodes, there are also other types of anodes. Among these, nickel-based anodes have the highest catalytic activity and are relatively inexpensive, making them popular among researchers. However, nickel-based anodes tend to self-sinterer, which reduces porosity and results in a smaller three-phase interface area. This in turn negatively affects the electrochemical performance of the anode. To overcome these limitations, composite anodes have been developed that combine conductive materials such as nickel oxide (NiO) with ion-conductive materials, yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ), and gadolinium-doped ceria (GDC) have been developed.

Because of its advantages in terms of rapid heating, microwave sintering technology is also being considered for the preparation of anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. Remarkably, numerous studies have shown that microwave sintering technology has unique advantages in the regulating of the crystal phase structure, which significantly affects the catalytic activity of the anode. The microwave assisted synthesis of nanocomposite powders, uses water-soluble nitrates, citric acid, and ethylene glycol as starting materials. This particular technique facilitates the synthesis of uniform nanocomposite powders, such as NiO–YSZ, NiO–Ce0.5Zr0.5O2, and Ni–10Sc1CeZr [74-76]. In addition, microwave assisted hydrothermal synthesis has been used to synthesize NiO–Ce1–xEuxO2–d powders, which can be used to replace conventional NiO–YSZ anodes in SOFCs [77]. The use of microwave assisted hydrothermal synthesis facilitates the formation of crystalline β-nickel hydroxide at low temperatures, resulting in larger grain sizes of NiO in NiO–YSZ–CeO2 composites [78]. Nanoscale anode powders can increase the area of the triple-phase boundary (TPB), resulting in a lower activation energy for oxygen ion conduction, thus improving anode performance. Rapid microwave irradiation is also a technology that can be used to prepare carbon-tolerant anode in a short period of time [79, 80]. In addition, microwave sintering is used to anode-electrolyte co-sintering due to its ability to produce high-density electrolytes rapidly and easily [45]. Furthermore, the rapid microwave sintering method allows the creation of pure perovskite phase structures in a reducing atmosphere. The conductivity of La0.3Sr0.7Ti0.9Nb0.1O3 (LSTN) prepared under a 5% H2+95% Ar atmosphere in the microwave cavity was higher than that of conventional sintering, because the reducing atmosphere increased the reduction conversion of Ti4+ to Ti3+, which contributed to the higher oxygen ion conductivity [81].

In summary, microwave sintering technology can assist in the rapid synthesis of nanoscale anode powders with increased specific surface area, which serves as the site for the catalytic fuel oxidation reaction. Table 2 provides a summary of the investigations on the application of microwave heating technology to anode materials, including the specific methods used and the corresponding synthesis times and powder grain sizes obtained. The table provides an overview of the various microwave-assisted powder synthesis techniques documented in the scientific literature, including microwave hydrothermal synthesis, microwave assisted combustion, and microwave-assisted sol-gel processes.

Table 2. Brief summary of microwave assisted preparation of anode materials.
\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Anode powders } & \text { Fabrication process } & \text { Grain size } & \text { Microwave processing } & \text { Ref. } \\ \hline \mathrm{NiO} / \mathrm{YSZ} & \text { MW assisted combustion method } & \sim 15 \mathrm{~nm} & 10 \mathrm{~s}(1200 \mathrm{~W}, 2.45 \mathrm{GHz}) & 74 \\ \hline \mathrm{Cu}-\mathrm{Ni} / \mathrm{YSZ} & \text { MW assisted adhesion of Cu particles on Ni/YSZ } & \sim 21 \mathrm{~nm} & 60 \mathrm{~s}(700 \mathrm{~W}, 2.45 \mathrm{GHz}) & 80 \\ \hline \mathrm{Ni} / \mathrm{YSZ} & \text { MW assisted anode-electrolyte co-sintering } & - & 1600^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 8 \mathrm{~min} & 45 \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{0.3} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.7} \mathrm{Ti}_{0.9} \mathrm{Nb}_{0.1} \mathrm{O}_3 & \text { MW assisted combustion } & - & 300 \mathrm{~W}, 3 \mathrm{~min}\left(5 \% \mathrm{H}_2+95 \% \mathrm{Ar}\right) & 81 \\ \hline \mathrm{NiOCe}_{1-x} \mathrm{Eu}_{\mathrm{x}} \mathrm{O}_{2-\delta} & \text { MW assisted hydrothermal synthesis } & - & 900^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 1 \mathrm{~h} & 82 \\ \hline \mathrm{YSZ}_2 \mathrm{CeO}_2 & \text { MW assisted hydrothermal synthesis } & 14 \mathrm{~nm} & 130^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 2 \mathrm{~h} ; 1200^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 3 \mathrm{~h} & 83 \\ \hline \mathrm{NiOCe}_{0.5} \mathrm{Zr}_{0.5} \mathrm{O}_2 & \text { MW assisted combustion method } & 14 \mathrm{~nm} & 700^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 2 \mathrm{~h} & 75 \\ \hline \mathrm{NiO}{-}\mathrm{YSZ}{-}\mathrm{CeO}_2 & \text { MW assisted hydrothermal synthesis } & 750 \mathrm{~nm} & 130^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 2 \mathrm{~h} ; 500^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 4 \mathrm{~h} & 78 \\ \hline \mathrm{NiO}{-}\mathrm{ZrO}_2{-}\mathrm{Y}_2\mathrm{O}_3{-}\mathrm{TiO}_2 & \text { MW assisted mechanical mixed oxide method } & - & 1400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 30 \mathrm{~min}(900 \mathrm{~W}, 2.45 \mathrm{GHz}) & 84 \\ \hline \mathrm{NiO} / 10 \mathrm{Sc} 1 \mathrm{CeSZ} & \text { MW assisted glycine nitrate combustion } & 30-60 \mathrm{~nm} & 3 \mathrm{~s}(700 \mathrm{~W}, 2.5 \mathrm{GHz}) & 76 \\ \hline \text{ Manganese anode mud } & \text { MW assisted solid phase reaction } & - & 10 \mathrm{~min}(1000 \mathrm{~W}, 2.45 \mathrm{GHz}) & 85 \\ \hline \mathrm{NiO} / \mathrm{SDC} & \text { MW assisted glycine nitrate combustion } & 7 \mathrm{~nm} & 133 \mathrm{~W}-532 \mathrm{~W}-798 \mathrm{~W} \text { in an on/off cycle } & 86 \\ & & & (10 \mathrm{~s} \text { on and } 20 \mathrm{~s} \text { off }) \text { for } 10 \mathrm{~min} \\ \hline \end{array} \]
Note. \( \sigma \) is non-stoichiometric oxides. Refs: [74], [80], [45], [81], [77], [82], [75], [78], [83], [76], [84], [85]
(2)

The solid oxide fuel cell cathode, also known as the oxygen electrode, is the site of reactions, such as oxygen adsorption, dissociation, and diffusion. The key characteristics of ideal SOFC cathode materials are as following: high catalytic activity for oxygen reduction reactions, high electron conductivity, and ionic conductivity, suitable porosity and large specific surface area, high chemical stability in an oxidizing atmosphere, reasonable chemical compatibility and a thermal expansion coefficient similar to that of the electrolytes.

The cathodes are usually prepared by screen printing, spin coating, impregnation-coating, flow retardation, etc. The void ratio and pore size of the cathodes are controlled by adjusting the type and amount of pore-forming agent and the sintering process of the cathodes. However, in order to achieve good adhesion between the cathode and electrolyte, the sintering temperature of the cathode usually reaches 1000–1200 °C. At such high sintering temperatures, the cathode particles grow rapidly, usually to the micron level. As the particle size increases, the specific surface area of the cathode decreases, resulting in less contact area with the air which is closely related to the TPB and the reactive capacity of the cathode.

Due to their small particle size, large specific surface area, and high catalytic activity, nanocathodes have become a hot topic of research in medium temperature SOFC research in recent years. As the particle size decreases, the specific surface area of the material increases, allowing for a larger three-phase reaction interface and more active sites for oxygen reduction, which can significantly reduce the polarization resistance of the cathode. A microwave-assisted pore wetting technique was used to prepare nanotube structure of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3, which exhibits excellent cathode performance for SOFCs [86]. Compared with conventional micro-structured materials, the surface of the nanotubue cathode prepared using microwave irradiation technology has more active reaction sites. Microwave assisted combustion technology has also been used to prepare mixed ion-electron conducting nanoscale cathode materials. Nanoscale Nd1.8Ce0.2Cu0.5Ni0.5O4+d cathode powders produced by microwave-assisted combustion are considered a potential cathode material for SOFC applications due to their good electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction [87]. Since a material itself converts microwave energy into heat via electromagnetic field coupling, the gel can quickly reach its autoignition temperature. The resulting precursor powders can be sintered at high temperatures to achieve effective powder microstructure control [88-90]. Other mixed ionic electronic conductors (MIECs) of the A2BO4 (A is rare earth element, alkaline earth metal; B is transition metal) type structure, such as Nd1.8Sr0.2NiO4+d ( [91].) and Pr1.6Sr0.4CuO4±d ( [92].), have attracted the attention to microwave technology because of their high electronic conductivity, sufficient oxygen ion conductivity and strong electrocatalytic activity towards oxygen reduction reaction (ORR).

In addition, some ABO3-structured perovskite cathode materials with mixed electronic and ionic conductivity, such as La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ(LSCF), are chemically compatible with barium cerate-based electrolyte materials [93]. Ali et al [94] investigated the effect of microwave energy on the properties of LSCF powders synthesized by the microwave-assisted combustion method. Figure 10. shows the microstructures of LSCF synthesized by microwave combustion and conventional combustion. The cross-sectional views of the conventional-LSCF and microwave-LSCF films deposited on the electrolyte surface are shown in Figure 10.a,b, respectively. Microwave LSCF films are more porous (Figure 10.d) than conventional LSCF films (Figure 10.c). Figure 10.d also shows continuous voids, which can facilitate the migration of oxygen ions. A porosity of 30% to 40% allows for easy oxygen transport through the porous body of the microwave LSCF cathode, occupying the adsorption sites on LSCF and enhancing electron transfer. Microwave LSCF had small particle sizes and uniformly distributed pores, resulting in a highly porous structure (Figure 10.b,d). This result can be attributed to the different powder morphologies, calcination temperatures, and solid contents of LSCF. As a result, microwave heating can be used to prepare LSCF powders and create an optimal porous structure. Furthermore, the performance of microwave combustion cathode is superior to that of conventional heating cathode. The investigation of La0.7–xPrxCa0.3MnO3 prepared by microwave-assisted combustion showed that the synthesis method of microwave assisted combustion can modulate the microscopic morphology of powders and promote the conductivities [95]. A pure perovskite La0.7Sr0.3Fe0.7Ga0.3O3–d was prepared in the air by the microwave assisted combustion method and evaluated as an electrode for a symmetrical solid oxide fuel cell [96].

Figure 10.
SEM images of surfaces (a, b) and cross sections (c, d) of pellets sintered at 1200 °C: (a, c) conventional LSCF and (b, d) microwave LSCF. (Reprinted with permission from [94] Copyright 2017 Elsevier.)

Some studies have found that microwave heating can promote the rapid adhesion of the cathode layer to the electrolyte layer and reduce not only the sintering temperature but also the sintering time. Bi and coworkers took the lead in studying the application of microwave sintering technology to protonconducting SOFCs(H-SOFCs), exploring the effect of microwave fields on cathode morphology, electrolyte-cathode layer interface and electrochemical performance [28, 97]. Figure 11.b–d show the SEM images of cathode electrolyte interfaces after fuel cell testing. Cathodes sintered at 900 °C for 10 min by microwave and conventional technologies were both porous, while the microwave sintered cathode layer adhered better to the electrolyte than the conventional sintering one. Although good cathode-electrolyte adhesion can be achieved by conventional sintering, increasing the cosintering temperature and calcination time increases the cathode grain size while decreasing the porosity [98, 99]. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy confirmed that low cathode porosity increases polarization resistance and poor cathode-electrolyte adhesion increases ohmic resistance Figure 11.e–f.

Figure 11.
SEM images for (a) the section of a fabricated cell, (b) cathode/electrolyte interface (microwave-assisted cathode co-sintered at 900 °C for 10 min); (c) cathode/electrolyte interface (conventional method assisted cathode co-sintered at 900 °C for 10 min) and (d) cathode/electrolyte interface (conventional method assisted cathode co-sintered at 1000 °C for 2 h); electrochemical impedance spectra of the cells with a Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3–d (BSCF) cathode co-sintered at 900 °C for 10 min by (e) microwave sintering, (f) conventional sintering. (Reprinted with permission from [97] Copyright 2019 Elsevier.)

In general, microwave sintering technology is widely used in the cathode treatment of solid oxide fuel cells. The latest research results on cathode treatment using microwave technology are collected and shown in Table 2. Microwave technology can not only control the microscopic phase properties of the cathode, such as porosity and TPB, but also improve the adhesion of the cathode-electrolyte layer and reduce the interfacial resistance.

Table 3. A brief summary of microwave assisted preparation of cathode materials.
\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Cathode powders } & \text { Fabrication process } & \text { Grain size } & \text { Microwave } \text { processing } & \text { Electrochemical properties } & \text { Ref. } \\ \hline \mathrm{Ln}_{0.7} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.3-x} \mathrm{Ca}_x \mathrm{CO}_{0.9} \mathrm{Fe}_{0.1} \mathrm{O}_{3-\delta} (x=0.05,0.10,0.15) & \text { MW assisted solid phase } \text { synthesis } & 1-20 \mu \mathrm{m} & 1200^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 30 \mathrm{~min} & \sigma_{700{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=100 \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 101 \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{0.6} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.4} \mathrm{Co}_{0.2} \mathrm{Fe}_{0.8} \mathrm{O}_3 \text { nanotubes } & \text { MW assisted pore wetting } & 20 \mathrm{~nm} & 6 \mathrm{~min} & - & 87 \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{0.1} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.9} \mathrm{Co}_{0.8} \mathrm{Fe}_{0.2} \mathrm{O}_{3-\delta} & \text { MW assisted cathode layer } \text { screen printing } & - & 950^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 2 \mathrm{~min} & \text { Cathode } \operatorname{ASR}\left(650^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right)= 0.014 \Omega \mathrm{cm}^2 & 102 \\ \hline \mathrm{Nd}_{1.8} \mathrm{Ce}_{0.2} \mathrm{Cu}_{0.5} \mathrm{Ni}_{0.5} \mathrm{O}_{4+\delta} & \text { MW assisted sol-gel combustion } & 185 \mathrm{~nm} & 800 \mathrm{~W} & \sigma_{700{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=0.619 \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 88 \\ \hline \mathrm{Nd}_{1.8} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.2} \mathrm{NiO}_{4+\delta} & \text { MW assisted sol-gel combustion } & 166 \mathrm{~nm} & 1200^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 4 \mathrm{~h} & \sigma_{660{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=61 \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 92 \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{0.6} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.4} \mathrm{Co}_{0.2} \mathrm{Fe}_{0.8} \mathrm{O}_{3-\delta^{-}} 20 \text { wt. } \% \mathrm{Ce}_{0.78} \mathrm{Gd}_{0.2} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.02} \mathrm{O}_{2-\delta} & \text { MW assisted cathode layer } \text { screen printing } & {-} & 1000^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 1 \mathrm{~h} & R_{P 700^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=6.6 \Omega \mathrm{cm}^2 & 103 \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{1.7} \mathrm{Sm}_{0.3} \mathrm{Mo}_2 \mathrm{O}_9 & \text { MW assisted combustion } & 25 \mathrm{~nm} & 900 \mathrm{~W}, 10 \mathrm{~min} & \sigma_{750^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=0.196 \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} &104 \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{0.7} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.3} \mathrm{Fe}_{0.7} \mathrm{Ga}_{0.3} \mathrm{O}_{3-\delta} & \text { MW assisted combustion } & 26.8-35.1 \mathrm{~nm} & {-} &\sigma_{800{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=47.45 \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 97 \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{0.6} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.4} \mathrm{Co}_{0.2} \mathrm{Fe}_{0.8} \mathrm{O}_{3-\delta} & \text { MW assisted combustion } & 113 \mathrm{~nm} & 650-700 \mathrm{~W}, 10 \mathrm{~min} & \text { Cathode } \operatorname{ASR}\left(750^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right)= 0.097 \Omega \mathrm{cm}^2 & 95 \\ \hline \mathrm{Sm}_{0.5} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.5} \mathrm{CoO}_{3-\delta}-\mathrm{BaZr}_{0.1} \mathrm{Ce}_{0.7} \mathrm{Y}_{0.2} \mathrm{O}_{3-\delta} &\text { MW assisted electrolyte-cathode } \text { co-sintering } & - & 1100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 2 \mathrm{~h} & \mathrm{MPD}_{700{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=449 \mathrm{~mW} \mathrm{~cm}^{-2} & 67 \\ \hline \mathrm{Pr}_{1.6} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.4} \mathrm{CuO}_{4 \pm \delta} & \text { MW assisted combustion } & 728 \mathrm{~nm} & 1000^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 4 \mathrm{~h} & \sigma_{700^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=63.1 \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 93 \\ \hline \mathrm{Ba}_{0.5} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.5} \mathrm{Co}_{0.8} \mathrm{Fe}_{0.2} \mathrm{O}_{3-\delta} & \text { MW assisted cathode layer } \text { deposition } & - & 900^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 10 \mathrm{~min} & \mathrm{MPD}_{700{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=0.96 \mathrm{~mW} \mathrm{~cm}^{-2} & 98 \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{0.6} \mathrm{Sr}_{0.4} \mathrm{Co}_{0.2} \mathrm{Fe}_{0.8} \mathrm{O}_{3-\delta}-\mathrm{Ce}_{0.8} \mathrm{Sm}_{0.2} \mathrm{O}_{1.9} & \text { MW assisted combustion } & 79-96 \mathrm{~nm} & 900 \mathrm{~W}, 5 \mathrm{~min} & R_{P 700^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=0.68 \Omega \mathrm{cm}^2 & 105 \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{0.07} \mathrm{Pr}_{0.63} \mathrm{Ca}_{0.3} \mathrm{MnO}_3 & \text { MW assisted combustion } & - & 900 \mathrm{~W}, 4 \mathrm{~min} & \sigma_{700{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=0.68 \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 96 \\ \hline \mathrm{La}_{0.6} \mathrm{Ca}_{0.4} \mathrm{Ni}_{0.2} \mathrm{Fe}_{0.8} \mathrm{O}_3 & \text { MW assisted combustion } & \text { - } & \text { - } & \sigma_{700{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}=29.6 \mathrm{~S} \mathrm{~cm}^{-1} & 106 \\ \hline \end{array} \]
Note. \( \sigma \) is non-stoichiometric oxides, s is electrical conductivity, RP is polarization resistance, MPD is maximum power density, ASR is area specific resistance. Refs: [100], [86], [101], [87], [91], [102], [103], [96], [94], [67], [92], [97], [104], [95], [105]
(3)

4. Conclusion and perspective

In this review, we have witnessed the application of microwave technology to SOFC production over the past decade. Microwave sintering technology, unlike traditional sintering methods, converts electromagnetic energy into thermal energy due to the dielectric losses of the material when exposed to electromagnetic waves. Due to its unique heating mechanism, microwave sintering technology has the advantage of low temperature and period in the synthesis of materials, and the material microstructure can be well regulated.

As this review has shown, microwave heating technology can be used to optimize the microstructure of the electrolyte, anode, and cathode, the three main components of fuel cells. By applying microwave energy, it is possible to increase the density of the electrolyte and decrease the resistance of the material in bulk and grain boundary. For the anode, microwave treatment can effectively control the microstructure to increase the catalytic activity. For the cathode, microwave treatment can also optimize the interface with the electrolyte as well as improve the microstructure and enhance the catalytic activity.

Although great progress has been made in recent years in solid oxide fuel cells using microwave treatment technology, several key issues remain to be addressed to propose future research directions.

(1) Further fundamental study of the influence of electromagnetic waves on the properties of SOFC materials. The dielectric losses of a material correlate with the efficiency of its absorption of electromagnetic waves, which in turn closely relates to the efficiency of sintering. The study of electromagneticthermal stress fields will improve the sintering efficiency, leading to the optimization of the cathode-electrolyte interface and, consequently, to improved electrochemical performance.

(2) In-depth study of the influence of microwave treatment on microscopic morphology of SOFC materials. The regulation of the microscopic morphology of materials by microwave heating is currently limited to the regulation of crystal size, but only further studies will show the influence on grain boundary growth, defect generation and conductivity variation.

5. List of acronyms and designations

BZCY — BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.2O3–d,
CMC — ceramic matrix composite,
GDC — Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95,
H-SOFC — proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells,
LSCF — La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3–d,
LSGM — La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.83Mg0.17O2.815,
MIEC — mixed ionic-electronic conductor,
OCV — open circuit voltage,
SDC — Ce0.8Sm0.2O19,
SOFC — solid oxide fuel cells,
TPB — triple-phase boundary,
YSZ — yttria-stabilized zirconia.

References

1.
From fossil to low carbon: The evolution of global public energy innovation
Zhang F., Gallagher K.S., Myslikova Z., Narassimhan E., Bhandary R.R., Huang P.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Wiley, 2021
2.
An improved decomposition approach toward energy rebound effects in China: Review since 1992
Chen J., Gao M., Shahbaz M., Cheng S., Song M.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, 2021
5.
A review on anion exchange membranes for fuel cells: Anion-exchange polyelectrolytes and synthesis strategies
Huang J., Yu Z., Tang J., Wang P., Tan Q., Wang J., Lei X.
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Elsevier, 2022
6.
Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs): a review of an environmentally clean and efficient source of energy
Stambouli A.B., Traversa E.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, 2002
7.
A comprehensive review of recent progresses in cathode materials for Proton-conducting SOFCs
Gao Y., Zhang M., Fu M., Hu W., Tong H., Tao Z.
Energy Reviews, Elsevier, 2023
8.
Optimization strategies for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) application: A literature survey
Ramadhani F., Hussain M.A., Mokhlis H., Hajimolana S.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, 2017
10.
Review of SOFC Cathode Performance Enhancement by Surface Modifications: Recent Advances and Future Directions
Chen S., Zhang H., Yao C., Lou H., Chen M., Lang X., Cai K.
Energy & Fuels, American Chemical Society (ACS), 2023
11.
Highly enhanced electrical properties of lanthanum-silicate-oxide-based SOFC electrolytes with co-doped tin and bismuth in La9.33−xBixSi6−ySnyO26
Noviyanti A.R., Juliandri, Winarsih S., Syarif D.G., Malik Y.T., Septawendar R., Risdiana
RSC Advances, Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), 2021
13.
Bioalcohol Reforming: An Overview of the Recent Advances for the Enhancement of Catalyst Stability
Palma V., Ruocco C., Cortese M., Martino M.
Catalysts, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), 2020
14.
Microwave-responsive catalysts for wastewater treatment: A review
Wei R., Wang P., Zhang G., Wang N., Zheng T.
Chemical Engineering Journal, Elsevier, 2020
15.
Carbon-enabled microwave chemistry: From interaction mechanisms to nanomaterial manufacturing
17.
Microwave sintering of ceramic reinforced metal matrix composites and their properties: a review
Alem S.A., Latifi R., Angizi S., Hassanaghaei F., Aghaahmadi M., Ghasali E., Rajabi M.
Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Taylor & Francis, 2020
18.
Progress in aluminium and magnesium matrix composites obtained by spark plasma, microwave and induction sintering
Dudina D.V., Georgarakis K., Olevsky E.A.
International Materials Reviews, Taylor & Francis, 2022
20.
Isotropic high softening point petroleum pitch-based carbon as anode for high-performance potassium-ion batteries
Wang M., Zhu Y., Zhang Y., Duan J., Wang K., Wang R., Sun G., Wang C.
Journal of Power Sources, Elsevier, 2021
22.
Rapid microwave sintering of functional electroceramic materials
Egorov S.V., Eremeev A.G., Kholoptsev V.V., Plotnikov I.V., Rybakov K.I., Sorokin A.A., Balabanov S.S., Rostokina E.Y.
Ceramics International, Elsevier, 2023
24.
Fabrication of ceramic bioscaffolds from fly ash cenosphere by susceptor-assisted microwave sintering
Yeung K., Tang C., Hu R., Lam C., Law W., Tsui G.C., Zhao X., Chung J.K.
Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Elsevier, 2022
26.
Effect of Europium Addition on the Microstructure and Dielectric Properties of CCTO Ceramic Prepared Using Conventional and Microwave Sintering
Evangeline T G., Annamalai A R., Ctibor P.
Molecules, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), 2023
27.
Ultra-fast route to fabricate large-area anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell via microwave-assisted sintering
Hussain A., ul Hassan M., Song R., Khan M.Z., Mehdi A.M., Ryu H.J., Kim T., Hong J., Joh D.W., Lee S., Lim T.
Ceramics International, Elsevier, 2023
28.
Microwave heating technology for electrolytes of solid oxide fuel cells
Yu S., Gu Y., Bi L.
Russian Chemical Reviews, Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii, 2022
29.
Microwave heating applications in environmental engineering—a review
Jones D.A., Lelyveld T.P., Mavrofidis S.D., Kingman S.W., Miles N.J.
Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Elsevier, 2002
32.
Heat and Mass Transfer in Microwave Processing
Saltiel C., Datta A.K.
Advances in Heat Transfer, Elsevier, 1999
33.
Research progress of ceramic matrix composites for high temperature stealth technology based on multi-scale collaborative design
Fu Z., Pang A., Luo H., Zhou K., Yang H.
Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Elsevier, 2022
34.
Effect of composition on the enhanced microwave sintering of alumina-based ceramic composites
Samuels J., Brandon J.R.
Journal of Materials Science, Springer Nature, 1992
36.
Microwave–material interaction phenomena: Heating mechanisms, challenges and opportunities in material processing
Mishra R.R., Sharma A.K.
Composites - Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Elsevier, 2016
37.
Microwave assisted synthesis and sintering of La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.83Mg0.17O2.815
Subasri R., Mathews T., Sreedharan O.M.
Materials Letters, Elsevier, 2003
38.
Innovative processing of dense LSGM electrolytes for IT-SOFC's
Rambabu B., Ghosh S., Zhao W., Jena H.
Journal of Power Sources, Elsevier, 2006
39.
Preparation of La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.83Mg0.17O2.815 powders by microwave-induced poly(vinyl alcohol) solution polymerization
Zhai Y., Ye C., Xia F., Xiao J., Dai L., Yang Y., Wang Y.
Journal of Power Sources, Elsevier, 2006
41.
Alumina/cerium oxide nano-composite electrolyte for solid oxide fuel cell applications
Chockalingam R., Amarakoon V.R., Giesche H.
Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Elsevier, 2008
42.
Microwave Sintering of YSZ Electrolyte Materials for SOFC
Wang X.T., Kale G.M.
Key Engineering Materials, Trans Tech Publications, 2008
43.
Performance of an anode support solid oxide fuel cell manufactured by microwave sintering
44.
Effects of rapid process on the conductivity of multiple elements doped ceria-based electrolyte
45.
An ultra-fast fabrication technique for anode support solid oxide fuel cells by microwave
47.
Synthesis and properties of samaria-doped ceria electrolyte via ultrasound–microwave assisted sol–gel method
Bu Y., Zhong Q., Tan W., Zhou R., Song Y., Cai W.
Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, Elsevier, 2013
48.
Effects of the microwave heating on the properties of gadolinium-doped cerium oxide prepared by polyol method
Gondolini A., Mercadelli E., Sanson A., Albonetti S., Doubova L., Boldrini S.
Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Elsevier, 2013
49.
A high temperature reduction cleaning (HTRC) process: a novel method for conductivity recovery of yttrium-doped barium zirconate electrolytes
Han D., Iihara J., Uemura S., Kazumi K., Hiraiwa C., Majima M., Uda T.
Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), 2016
52.
A Novel Composite Cathode for Low-Temperature SOFCs Based on Oxide Proton Conductors
Yang L., Zuo C., Wang S., Cheng Z., Liu M.
Advanced Materials, Wiley, 2008
53.
Novel two-step processing route combining mechanical alloying and microwave hybrid sintering to fabricate dense La9.33Si2Ge4O26 for SOFCs
Santos M., Alves C., Oliveira F.A., Marcelo T., Mascarenhas J., Cavaleiro A., Trindade B.
Journal of Power Sources, Elsevier, 2013
54.
Microwave synthesis & sintering of Sm and Ca co-doped ceria ceramics
Prado-Gonjal J., Heuguet R., Muñoz-Gil D., Rivera-Calzada A., Marinel S., Morán E., Schmidt R.
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Elsevier, 2015
55.
Record-low sintering-temperature (600 °C) of solid-oxide fuel cell electrolyte
Dasari H.P., Ahn K., Park S., Hong J., Kim H., Yoon K.J., Son J., Kim B., Lee H., Lee J.
Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Elsevier, 2016
56.
Enhanced electrical conductivity of doped CeO2 under millimeter-wave irradiation heating
Che Abdullah S.S., Teranishi T., Hayashi H., Kishimoto A.
Materials and Design, Elsevier, 2017
57.
Enhanced ionic conductivity of scandia-ceria-stabilized-zirconia (10Sc1CeSZ) electrolyte synthesized by the microwave-assisted glycine nitrate process
Azim Jais A., Muhammed Ali S.A., Anwar M., Rao Somalu M., Muchtar A., Wan Isahak W.N., Yong Tan C., Singh R., Brandon N.P.
Ceramics International, Elsevier, 2017
59.
NiO-GDC-BCY composites as an anode for SOFC
Jadhav S.T., Puri V.R., Jadhav L.D.
Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Elsevier, 2016
60.
The structures of BaCeO3, BaPrO3 and BaTbO3 by neutron diffraction: lattice parameter relations and ionic radii in O-perovskites
Jacobson A.J., Tofield B.C., Fender B.E.
Acta Crystallographica Section B, International Union of Crystallography (IUCr), 1972
61.
Yttrium doped BaCeO3 thin films by spray pyrolysis technique for application in solid oxide fuel cell
Dubal S.U., Jamale A.P., Jadhav S.T., Patil S.P., Bhosale C.H., Jadhav L.D.
Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Elsevier, 2014
62.
Thermal, structural and electrical properties of samarium doped barium cerate electrolyte for SOFCs
Senthil Kumar A., Balaji R., Jayakumar S.
Materials Chemistry and Physics, Elsevier, 2017
64.
Structural, electrical and thermal studies on microwave sintered Dy and Pr co-doped ceria ceramics as electrolytes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells
Madhusudan C., Venkataramana K., Madhuri C., Vishnuvardhan Reddy C.
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, Springer Nature, 2018
65.
Low temperature microwave sintering of yttrium and samarium co-doped ceria solid electrolytes for IT-SOFCs
Venkataramana K., Ravindranath K., Madhuri C., Madhusudan C., Pavan Kumar N., Vishnuvardhan Reddy C.
Ionics, Springer Nature, 2017
66.
Microwave-sintered Pr3+, Sm3+, and Gd3+ triple-doped ceria electrolyte material for IT-SOFC applications
Venkataramana K., Madhuri C., Shanker J., Madhusudan C., Vishnuvardhan Reddy C.
Ionics, Springer Nature, 2018
69.
Strategy to improve phase compatibility between proton conductive BaZr0.8Y0.2O3−δ and nickel oxide
Han D., Otani Y., Noda Y., Onishi T., Majima M., Uda T.
RSC Advances, Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), 2016
70.
Microwave-assisted synthesis of gadolinia-doped ceria powders for solid oxide fuel cells
Gondolini A., Mercadelli E., Sanson A., Albonetti S., Doubova L., Boldrini S.
Ceramics International, Elsevier, 2011
71.
On the influence of silica type on the structural integrity of dense La9.33Si2Ge4O26 electrolytes for SOFCs
Alves C., Marcelo T., Oliveira F.A., Alves L.C., Mascarenhas J., Trindade B.
Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Elsevier, 2013
75.
Characteristic and preparation of Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 as the anode support for solid oxide fuel cells by phase inversion technology
Feng J., Qiao J., Sun W., Yang P., Li H., Wang Z., Sun K.
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Elsevier, 2015
76.
Performance of Ni/10Sc1CeSZ anode synthesized by glycine nitrate process assisted by microwave heating in a solid oxide fuel cell fueled with hydrogen or methane
Jais A.A., Ali S.A., Anwar M., Somalu M.R., Muchtar A., Isahak W.N., Baharudin N.A., Lim K.L., Brandon N.P.
Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, Springer Nature, 2020
77.
Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Synthesis of NiO-Ce1-XEuxO2-δ Powders for Fuel Cell Catalytic Anodes
Medeiros A.L., Martinelli A.E., Melo D.M., Orlandi M.O., Macedo D.A.
ECS Transactions, The Electrochemical Society, 2014
78.
Influence of microwave-assisted hydrothermal treatment on the properties of nickel oxide–zirconia based composites
Pinheiro L.B., Tabuti F.N., Martinelli A.E., Fonseca F.C.
Ceramics International, Elsevier, 2016
79.
Microwave-Assisted Preparation of Cu Coated Ni/YSZ Anode for Direct Utilization of Dry CH4 in SOFC
81.
Novel Microwave Reduction Sintering for Perovskite Anode
Chang H.Y., Wang Y.M., Lin C.H., Cheng S.Y.
Advanced Materials Research, Trans Tech Publications, 2013
82.
Effects of Microwave Processing on the Properties of Nickel Oxide/Zirconia/Ceria Composites
Pinheiro L.B., Martinelli A.E., Fonseca F.C.
Advanced Materials Research, Trans Tech Publications, 2014
84.
Dielectric properties and thermal behavior of electrolytic manganese anode mud in microwave field
Li K., Chen J., Peng J., Ruan R., Omran M., Chen G.
Journal of Hazardous Materials, Elsevier, 2020
86.
Synthesis and characterization La0.6Sr0.4CoO3 and La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 nanotubes for cathode of solid-oxide fuel cells
Sacanell Joaquín, Bellino M. G., Lamas D. G., Leyva A.G.
Physica B: Condensed Matter, Elsevier, 2007
88.
Microwave ignited combustion synthesis of aluminium nitride
Peng J., Binner J.
Journal of Materials Science Letters, Springer Nature, 2002
89.
Microwave-assisted combustion synthesis of nanocrystalline MgAl2O4 spinel powder
Ganesh I., Johnson R., Rao G.V., Mahajan Y.R., Madavendra S.S., Reddy B.M.
Ceramics International, Elsevier, 2005
91.
Influence of synthesis route on electrical and electrochemical properties of Nd1.8Sr0.2NiO4+
92.
Development of Pr2-Sr CuO4± mixed ion-electron conducting system as cathode for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell
Khandale A.P., Pahune B.S., Bhoga S.S., Kumar R.V., Tomov R.
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Elsevier, 2019
93.
Materials and manufacturing technologies for solid oxide fuel cells
Menzler N.H., Tietz F., Uhlenbruck S., Buchkremer H.P., Stöver D.
Journal of Materials Science, Springer Nature, 2010
95.
Microwave irradiation synthesis to obtain La0.7-xPrxCa0.3MnO3 perovskites: Electrical and electrochemical performance
Ferrel-Alvarez A.C., Domínguez-Crespo M.A., Cong H., Torres-Huerta A.M., Palma-Ramírez D., Irvine J.T.
Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Elsevier, 2021
96.
La0.7Sr0.3Fe0.7Ga0.3O3−δ as electrode material for a symmetrical solid oxide fuel cell
Yang Z., Chen Y., Jin C., Xiao G., Han M., Chen F.
RSC Advances, Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), 2015
98.
Facile fabrication of stable PdCu clusters uniformly decorated on graphene as an efficient electrocatalyst for formic acid oxidation
Zhang Z., Gong Y., Wu D., Li Z., Li Q., Zheng L., Chen W., Yuan W., Zhang L.Y.
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Elsevier, 2019
99.
Strategies for improving the lithium-storage performance of 2D nanomaterials
Mei J., Zhang Y., Liao T., Sun Z., Dou S.X.
National Science Review, Oxford University Press, 2017
100.
Electrical Properties and Microwave Synthesis of Mixed Rare Earth Oxide Ln0.7Sr0.3-x Cax Co0.9Fe0.1 O3-δ
Wenyuan G., Juncai S., Sha L., Yang L., Changmin L., Nailing T.
Journal of Rare Earths, Chinese Society of Rare Earths, 2006
103.
Microwave-assisted combustion synthesis of nanocrystalline Sm-doped La 2 Mo 2 O 9 oxide-ion conductors for SOFC application
Saradha T., Subramania A., Balakrishnan K., Muzhumathi S.
Materials Research Bulletin, Elsevier, 2015
104.
Cathodic polarisation of composite LSCF-SDC IT-SOFC electrode synthesised by one-step microwave self-assisted combustion
Loureiro F.J., Macedo D.A., Nascimento R.M., Cesário M.R., Grilo J.P., Yaremchenko A.A., Fagg D.P.
Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Elsevier, 2019
105.
Investigation of structural, electrical and ionic properties of La0.6Ca0.4Fe0.8Ni0.2O3 as an IT-SOFC cathode synthesized through microwave-assisted method
Ekraminejad N., Jafari M., Amiri T., Shahsavari E., Salamati H., Ranjbar M.
Materials Chemistry and Physics, Elsevier, 2022